Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. FRANK L. MORRISON, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order of Genesee County Court that affirmed an order of Elba Town Court determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Preliminarily, we note that “[a]n appeal may be taken to the appellate division as of right from an order of a county court ․ which determines an appeal from a judgment of a lower court” (CPLR 5703[b] ), and here County Court determined the appeal from an order of Town Court, not a judgment. Nonetheless, we conclude that this appeal from an “order” rather than a “judgment” is properly before us as of right pursuant to CPLR 5703(b) inasmuch as “ ‘the rights of the parties are for all practical purposes finally determined’ “ (People v. Willis, 130 AD3d 1470, 1471; see Highlands Ins. Co. v. Maddena Constr. Co., 109 A.D.2d 1071, 1072).
With respect to the merits, we reject defendant's contention that the People failed to present clear and convincing evidence to support the assessment of 15 points under risk factor 11 for defendant's history of alcohol and drug abuse (see Correction Law § 168–n [3] ). That assessment is sufficiently supported by reliable hearsay evidence inasmuch as the presentence report (PSR) shows that defendant was convicted in Florida in 2004 for driving under the influence (see Fla Stat § 316.193[1] ), and was shortly thereafter arrested again for the same offense; defendant's then–13–year–old daughter reported in a supporting deposition that defendant smoked marihuana with her on multiple occasions approximately two months before he sexually abused the daughter's friend; and the daughter's mother reported in a statement attached to the PSR that defendant had a history of daily drug use (see People v. Leeson, 148 AD3d 1677, 1678, lv denied _ NY3d _ [June 8, 2017]; People v. Regan, 46 AD3d 1434, 1434–1435; People v. Lewis, 37 AD3d 689, 689–690, lv. denied 8 NY3d 814; see generally People v. Ramos, 41 AD3d 1250, 1250, lv denied 9 NY3d 809).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: KA 16–02079
Decided: June 30, 2017
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)