Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. PHILLIP A. DODSON, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree (Penal Law
§ 120.10 [1] ). Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request, which he made just prior to sentencing, for the assignment of new counsel to advise him on whether he should move to withdraw his plea. We conclude that defendant's contention implicates the voluntariness of the plea and thus survives his plea and his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Morris, 94 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 19 NY3d 976; see also People v. Guantero, 100 AD3d 1386, 1387, lv denied 21 NY3d 1004; People v. Phillips, 56 AD3d 1163, 1164, lv denied 12 NY3d 761).
We nonetheless reject defendant's contention that the court abused its discretion in denying his request for a substitution of counsel. We conclude that the court made the requisite “minimal inquiry” into defendant's complaints concerning his attorney and his request for a substitution of counsel (People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822, 825; see People v. Porto, 16 NY3d 93, 99–100; People v. Linares, 2 NY3d 507, 511). Although it was incumbent upon defendant to show “good cause” for the substitution of counsel (Sides, 75 N.Y.2d at 824; see People v. Sawyer, 57 N.Y.2d 12, 18, rearg dismissed 57 N.Y.2d 776, cert denied 459 U.S. 1178), defendant expressed only “vague and generic” complaints having “no merit or substance” and thus failed to show that assigned counsel “was in any way deficient in representing him” (Linares, 2 NY3d at 511). Further, the circumstances of this case evince that defendant's request for a substitution of counsel was simply a delaying tactic to allow him to avoid or postpone his imminent sentencing and thereby “ ‘delay the orderly administration of justice’ “ (People v. Johnson, 292 A.D.2d 871, 872, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 652, quoting Sides, 75 N.Y.2d at 824).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 14–01031
Decided: February 03, 2017
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)