Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
West Realty LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Riverview West Contracting LLC, et al., Defendants, B & V Contracting Enterprises, Inc., Defendant–Respondent.
_
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered August 4, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendant B & V Contracting Enterprises, Inc. (B & V) for summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action alleging negligence as against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff was the sponsor of a condominium construction project, on which defendant Riverview West Contracting LLC was the general contractor, and B & V was a subcontractor hired by Riverview to perform certain carpentry and drywall work. Following the completion and opening of the condominium complex, it was discovered that B & V had performed certain of its work negligently.
The court properly dismissed the fourth cause of action alleging negligence against B & V, and seeking the cost of remediation and repair of B & V's negligent work, because plaintiff cannot recover contract damages under a negligence theory (see 532 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods v Finlandia Ctr., 96 N.Y.2d 280 [2001]; Residential Bd. of Mgrs. of Zeckendorf Towers v Union Sq.–14th Assoc., 190 A.D.2d 636 [1st Dept 1993] ). The fact that B & V's work had to do with fire-safing and fire-stopping the premises is not sufficient to create an independent duty to plaintiff (see Church v. Callanan Indus., 99 N.Y.2d 104, 112 [2002] ), and there is no allegation that B & V launched a force or instrument of harm (see Espinal v. Melville Snow Contrs., 98 N.Y.2d 136, 140 [2002] ).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2622 610
Decided: January 03, 2017
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)