Carlos Velez, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 2420 (2016)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Carlos Velez, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 2420 Davidson, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

2191

Decided: November 15, 2016

Renwick, J.P., Moskowitz, Kapnick, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

Cascone & Kluepfel, LLP, Garden City (James K. O'Sullivan of counsel), for appellants. Joel Zuckerberg, Ossining, for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered January 19, 2016, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly found that triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendants created the dangerous condition of ice, on which plaintiff slipped and fell, or had actual orconstructive notice of it (see generally Rodriguez v 705–7 E. 179th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 79 AD3d 518 [1st Dept 2010] ).

DEPUTY CLERK

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network