Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SAMUEL WALTON, PETITIONER
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN COLVIN, SUPERINTENDENT, FIVE POINTS
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND ANTHONY ANNUCCI,
ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION,
RESPONDENTS.
PRO SE.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F. Bender, A.J.], entered January 19, 2016) to review a determination finding after a tier II hearing that petitioner had violated two inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination, following a tier II disciplinary hearing, that he violated two inmate rules. We reject petitioner's contention that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence. Specifically, the misbehavior report, together with the videotape of the incident and the hearing testimony of the correction officer who prepared the misbehavior report, “constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated [the] inmate rule[s]” at issue (Matter of Oliver v. Fischer, 82 AD3d 1648, 1648). Petitioner's denials of the reported misbehavior presented only an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: TP 16–00103
Decided: November 10, 2016
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)