Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael T., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Holly Cooper of counsel), for presentment agency.
_
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about April 21, 2014, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and jostling, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348–349 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, including its evaluation of inconsistencies.
Appellant did not preserve his claim that the court erred in admitting evidence of his pretrial silence, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. The record plainly demonstrates the court's awareness that pretrial silence is inadmissible, and its general refusal to receive such evidence. Accordingly, there is no reason to believe that the allegedly offending question influenced the court's fact-finding determination (see People v. Torres, 249 A.D.2d 229 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 861 [1998]; see also Matter of Jamar W., 269 A.D.2d 103 [1st Dept 2000], lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 752 [2000] ).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1996
Decided: October 20, 2016
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)