Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. LATEEK NEWTON, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 205.25[2] ), defendant contends that his guilty plea was not voluntary, knowing and intelligent because County Court failed to inquire into a possible defense. That contention is actually a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see generally People v. Hicks, 128 AD3d 1358, 1359, lv denied 27 NY3d 999; People v. Rios, 93 AD3d 1349, 1349, lv. denied 19 NY3d 966), and is therefore encompassed by defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Jamison, 71 AD3d 1435, 1436, lv. denied 14 NY3d 888; People v. Peters, 59 AD3d 928, 928, lv denied 12 NY3d 820; see generally People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). Moreover, that contention is not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665; People v. Lugg, 108 AD3d 1074, 1075). This case does not fall within the rare exception to the preservation requirement inasmuch as the plea allocution neither negated an essential element of the crime nor otherwise cast doubt on the voluntariness of the plea (see Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d at 666).
To the extent that defendant's contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea and valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Strickland, 103 AD3d 1178, 1178), we conclude that it is without merit. “In the context of a guilty plea, a defendant has been afforded meaningful representation when he or she receives an advantageous plea and nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel” (People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404), and that is the case here (see People v. Garner, 86 AD3d 955, 956).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 15–01171
Decided: October 07, 2016
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)