Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kaylynn M., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Victoria Scalzo of counsel), for presentment agency.
_
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about January 7, 2015, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon her admission that she committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it denied appellant's motion to convert the juvenile delinquency petition into a person in need of supervision petition (see e.g. Matter of Diana P., 49 AD3d 390 [1st Dept 2008] ). The record demonstrates that the underlying incident had a violent component, that appellant had a history of arrests, juvenile delinquency adjudications and noncompliance with supervision, that she used drugs and alcohol, that she was frequently truant, and that she often broke curfew. These factors outweighed some recent improvement in appellant's behavior during the pendency of the case. Furthermore, a juvenile delinquency adjudication was necessary to ensure appellant's compliance with treatment. “[T]he irony is presented that while the court may direct the PINS youth not to abscond, the statutory authority constraining the court essentially precludes an effective remedy should the youth abscond” (Matter of Edwin G., 296 A.D.2d 7, 11 [1st Dept 2002] ).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1787
Decided: October 04, 2016
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)