Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Mohamed Abdelal, Petitioner, v. Commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly, et al., Respondents.
_
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly (Commissioner), dated January 29, 2013, which terminated petitioner's employment with the New York City Police Department (N.Y.PD), upon findings, after a hearing, that he, among other things, engaged in conduct prejudicial to the good order, efficiency and discipline of the NYPD, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Shlomo Hagler, J.], entered on or about June 16, 2014), dismissed, without costs.
The hearing testimony from Hudson County, New Jersey correctional employees constitutes substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioner engaged in conduct prejudicial to the good order, efficiency and discipline of the NYPD (see generally Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443 [1987] ). An adverse inference was not warranted, because there was no evidence that the NYPD possessed, destroyed, or withheld the audio recording and in-house reports at issue (Cordero v. Mirecle Cab Corp., 51 AD3d 707, 709 [2d Dept 2008] ), nor did petitioner demonstrate that the audio recording ever existed (Cuevas v. 1738 Assoc., LLC, 96 AD3d 637, 638 [1st Dept 2012] ). In addition, petitioner did not seek the admission of the video recording, and, in any event, petitioner's counsel, who had viewed the video, stipulated to its contents.
The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness (Matter of Waldren v. Town of Islip, 6 NY3d 735, 736–737 [2005] ).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 549
Decided: March 17, 2016
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)