Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MICHAEL C. WAITE, PETITIONER–RESPONDENT, v. MALLORY J. CLANCY, RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHRISTINE M. VALKENBURGH, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BATH.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the conditions imposed with respect to any future application for resumption of visitation and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order that awarded petitioner father sole custody and placement of the parties' child and suspended visitation between the mother and the child “until she engages successfully in mental health and drug and alcohol evaluations, and ․ recommended treatment, and upon successful completion of [the] same is reserved the right to file a [m]odification.” Contrary to the mother's contention, Family Court's determination to suspend her visitation is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record inasmuch as the evidence presented at the hearing established that such visitation was detrimental to the child's welfare (see Matter of Christina F.F. v. Stephen T.C., 48 AD3d 1112, 1113, lv denied 10 NY3d 710). We agree with the mother, however, that the court lacked authority to condition the resumption of visitation upon her completion of mental health and drug and alcohol evaluations and compliance with all treatment recommendations (see Matter of Hameed v. Alatawaneh, 19 AD3d 1135, 1136; Matter of Davenport v. Ouweleen, 5 AD3d 1079, 1079–1080). We therefore modify the order accordingly. Finally, as we similarly concluded in the mother's related appeal (Matter of VanSkiver v. Clancy, 128 AD3d 1408, 1408–1409), the court did not abuse its discretion in denying her attorney's request for an adjournment and in holding the hearing in
her absence.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CAF 15–00187
Decided: February 05, 2016
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)