IN RE: CHRISTOPHER P. FOWLER (2016)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

IN RE: CHRISTOPHER P. FOWLER, PETITIONER–APPELLANT, v. VALERIE M. VANGEE, RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT.

CAF 15–00405

Decided: February 05, 2016

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

ROBERT A. DINIERI, CLYDE, FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner father appeals from an order dismissing his petition seeking to modify a prior order of visitation. Contrary to the father's contention, we conclude that Family Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his petition without conducting a hearing. A hearing is not required whenever a parent seeks modification of a visitation order and, here, the father “failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances to require a hearing” (Matter of Consilio v. Terrigino, 114 AD3d 1248, 1248 [internal quotation marks omitted] ).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network