Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
— IN RE: Shamiyah P., and Another, Dependent Children Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Anna P., Respondent–Appellant,
Commissioner of Social Services of
the City of New York, et al.,
Petitioners–Respondents.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the children.
_
Orders, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about August 4, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent mother is unable, by reason of mental retardation, to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children, terminated her parental rights to the children, and transferred their custody and guardianship to petitioners for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence, including expert testimony from the psychologist who examined the mother and reviewed all of her available medical and agency records, supports the determination that she is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care to the children because of her mental retardation (see Social Services Law § 384–b [4][c], [6][b] ). The evidence shows that even though the mother cooperated with the required services, her adaptive skills and ability to care for her two special needs children were not sufficient to insure their safety while in her care (see Matter of Jessica Latasha B., 234 A.D.2d 48, 48 [1st Dept 1996] ). A dispositional hearing was not required (Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39, 49 [1985]; Jessica Latasha B., 234 A.D.2d at 48).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1645 0 1645 1
Decided: December 22, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)