Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlo Rastaldo, Defendant–Appellant.
_
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered September 20, 2012, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of burglary in the second and third degrees and two counts of petit larceny, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 31/212 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the third-degree burglary conviction and dismissing that count of the indictment, and otherwise affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress statements made to the police prior to the administration of Miranda warnings. The record supports the court's finding that these statements were spontaneous, volunteered utterances that were not the product of police interrogation or its functional equivalent (see People v. Ealey, 272 A.D.2d 269 [1st Dept 2000], lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 865 [2000] ). In any event, the record also establishes that defendant's post-Miranda statements were attenuated from the statements at issue.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established the “dwelling” element of second-degree burglary (Penal Law § 140.25[2]; see People v. Joseph 124 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2015], lv granted 2015 N.Y. Slip Op 70750[U][2015] ).
As the People concede, the third-degree burglary count should be dismissed as a lesser included offense of second-degree burglary conviction.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1584 0
Decided: October 13, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)