Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JUAN C. MEDINA, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Jefferson County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 205.25[2] ). The record of the plea proceeding establishes that County Court failed to apprise defendant, a noncitizen, that deportation was a potential consequence of his guilty plea. As defendant contends and the People correctly concede, the case should be remitted to afford defendant “the opportunity to move to vacate his plea upon a showing that there is a ‘reasonable probability’ that he would not have pleaded guilty had the court advised him of the possibility of deportation” (People v. Fermin, 123 AD3d 465, 466, quoting People v. Peque, 22 NY3d 168, 198). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court for that purpose. Defendant further contends that counsel was ineffective in failing to inform him that deportation was a potential consequence of the plea (see Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356). Inasmuch as that contention is based upon matters outside the record, it must be raised in a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see People v. Drammeh, 100 AD3d 650, 651, lv denied 20 NY3d 1098).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: KA 10–00808
Decided: October 09, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)