Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JUSTIN T. BARENDS, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained in a gymnasium at a community center owned by defendant. While playing basketball there, plaintiff collided with and broke a window located near the edge of the basketball court. Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff assumed the risks associated with playing basketball. It is well settled that, “by engaging in a sport or recreational activity, a participant consents to those commonly appreciated risks [that] are inherent in and arise out of the nature of the sport generally and flow from such participation” (Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 484; see Larson v Cuba Rushford Cent. Sch. Dist., 78 AD3d 1687, 1687–1688). “A plaintiff, however, will not be deemed to have consented to ‘concealed or unreasonably increased risks' “ (Menter v. City of Olean, 105 AD3d 1405, 1405, quoting Morgan, 90 N.Y.2d at 485; see Andrews v. County of Onondaga, 298 A.D.2d 837, 838). Here, even assuming, arguendo, that defendant met its initial burden on the motion, we conclude that plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact by submitting the affidavit of a licensed architect who opined that the window involved in the accident did not meet industry standards for use in a gymnasium because the glass was not covered by a protective screen, nor was it laminated or tempered to withstand impact by a person (see Stevens v. Central Sch. Dist. No. 1, 25 A.D.2d 871, 872, affd 21 N.Y.2d 780). Thus, there is a triable issue of fact whether defendant “ ‘created a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers that are inherent in the sport’ “ of basketball (Morgan, 90 N.Y.2d at 485; see Menter, 105 AD3d at 1405–1406; Andrews, 298 A.D.2d at 838).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CA 15–00428
Decided: October 09, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)