Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KELSEY D. COVELL, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. SAMANTHA M. SLOCUM, DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries she allegedly sustained when she was struck by a vehicle operated by defendant on the street in front of plaintiff's house. Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant met her initial burden on the motion, we conclude that plaintiff's opposing papers demonstrated the existence of a triable issue of fact requiring denial of defendant's motion. Specifically, plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a witness who averred that, immediately after the accident, defendant essentially stated that she had not seen plaintiff prior to the collision. We reject defendant's contention that we should decline to consider that witness's affidavit because plaintiff failed to disclose the witness's identity and/or defendant's alleged statements in responding to defendant's discovery demands. Although defendant's “admissions” should have been disclosed during discovery, “there is no indication that the failure to do so was willful or contumacious” and, therefore, the affidavit “may properly be considered in opposition to defendant['s] motion” (Schaaf v. Pork Chop, Inc., 24 AD3d 1277, 1278). Nevertheless, in light of plaintiff's failure to disclose, we further conclude that, upon appropriate motion from defendant, the court should afford defendant additional rights of discovery pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.21(d) (see generally Gendusa v. Yu Lin Chen, 71 AD3d 1085, 1086; Schaaf, 24 AD3d at 1278).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CA 14–02183
Decided: July 10, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)