Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Andejo Corporation, doing business as Seaport Watch Company, et al., Plaintiffs, Fulton Market Retail Fish Inc., doing business as Simply Seafood, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. South Street Seaport Limited Partnership, et al., Defendants–Respondents.
_
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered November 14, 2013, which, following a nonjury trial, awarded defendants landlords South Street Seaport Limited Partnership and Seaport Marketplace, L.L.C. full and exclusive use and possession of the subject premises, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There is no basis upon which to disturb the factual findings of the trial court which rest largely on credibility determinations and are supported by evidence establishing that plaintiff tenant was in default of its lease based on its failure to pay rent and utilities (see Claridge Gardens v. Menotti, 160 A.D.2d 544 [1st 1990] ). The lease provided that upon “the occurrence and continuance of an Event of default,” defendants landlords, without notice, could elect to terminate the lease.
The trial court also properly found, based on evidence that plaintiff tenant deliberately and intentionally violated other lease provisions by failing to pay any utility charges for approximately a decade and misreporting gross sales, that equitable considerations do not warrant a finding that plaintiff should not forfeit the lease (see First Natl. Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., 21 N.Y.2d 630, 637 [1968] ).
We have considered plaintiff tenant's remaining arguments, including that it was entitled to exercise an option to renew the lease, and find them unavailing.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1562 1
Decided: July 02, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)