Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. CORI BUCKMAN, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: In 2008, defendant was convicted upon a plea of guilty of one count each of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03[3] ) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02[1] ). We modified the judgment of conviction by vacating the sentence imposed on both counts and remitted the matter to County Court for resentencing because “County Court erred in failing to impose a sentence for each count of which defendant was convicted” (People v. Buckman, 90 AD3d 1635, 1636, lv denied 18 NY3d 955). Upon remittal, County Court resentenced defendant on one count to a determinate term of incarceration of nine years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision, and to a concurrent indeterminate term of incarceration of 2 to 4 years on the other count.
We reject defendant's contention that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea with respect to both counts. While it is well settled that “a guilty plea induced by an unfulfilled promise either must be vacated or the promise honored” (People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 241, cert denied 419 U.S. 1122), it is also well settled that “[c]ompliance with a plea bargain is to be tested against an objective reading of the bargain, and not against a defendant's subjective interpretation thereof” (People v. Cataldo, 39 N.Y.2d 578, 580). Here, the only sentencing promise made to defendant was that he would receive a nine-year term of incarceration in exchange for his plea of guilty to both counts of the indictment. Thus, inasmuch as the aggregate prison term imposed by the court on resentencing was nine years of incarceration, we conclude that defendant “clearly received the benefit of his bargain” (People v. Collier, 22 NY3d 429, 434, cert denied _ U.S. _).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 12–00591
Decided: June 12, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)