Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
— A IN RE: Joshua Manuel G., and Another, Children Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Cathy C., Respondent–Appellant,
Edwin Gould Services for Children,
and Families,
Petitioner–Respondent,
Miguel G.,
Respondent.
John R. Eyerman, New York, for Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Patricia Colella of counsel), attorney for the children.
_
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about November 25, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon fact-finding determinations of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject children, and committed the children's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The findings of permanent neglect were supported by clear and convincing evidence that despite the agency's diligent efforts, the mother failed to plan for the future of the children (see Social Services Law § 384–b[7][a]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 373 [1984] ). The record demonstrates that the agency exerted diligent efforts to strengthen the mother's relationship with the children by referring her to, among other things, parenting skills, anger management, and domestic violence programs, and by scheduling and supervising visitation and therapy (see § 384–b[7][f]; Matter of Julian Raul S. [Oscar S.], 111 AD3d 456, 457 [1st Dept 2013] ). Despite the mother's completion of numerous programs, she failed to demonstrate that she had overcome her problem with anger management (see 111 AD3d at 457).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1507 6 1507 6
Decided: May 12, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)