Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Larry Brown, Defendant–Appellant.
_
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Nunez, J. at diversion proceeding; Lewis Bart Stone, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered October 15, 2012, convicting defendant of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 21/313 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record establishes that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered (see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536 [1993] ). Defendant's claim that he was misled about his prospects of receiving judicial diversion under CPL 216.05 is refuted by the record. The plea court explained to defendant that diversion was not guaranteed, it made no representations about the likelihood of defendant's acceptance for diversion, and it specified the sentence defendant would receive in the event of his rejection. Defendant's claim of innocence was refuted by the thorough factual allocution conducted at the time of the plea.
Furthermore, the plea was not induced by an illegal or unfulfilled sentence promise. Defendant received the precise sentence he was warned to expect in the absence of diversion, and he has not demonstrated how he was prejudiced by being sentenced in accordance with his plea.
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006] ). Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, or whether the waiver forecloses review of the postplea denial of judicial diversion, we find that the diversion court properly exercised its discretion in determining that defendant was not a suitable candidate (see People v. O'Keefe, 112 AD3d 524 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 1023 [2014] ).
_
DEPUTY CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1475 8
Decided: April 09, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)