IN RE: NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION (2015)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

IN RE: NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION, DENNIS ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CHAIRPERSON OF NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION LOCAL BARGAINING UNIT, NATHAN SULL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MEMBERSHIP CHAIRPERSON OF NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION LOCAL BARGAINING UNIT, CHRIS REED, INDIVIDUALLY, CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION INC., LOCAL 815, DENISE SYZMURA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF ERIE UNIT OF CSEA LOCAL 815, KEVIN KUMOR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF ERIE UNIT OF CSEA LOCAL 815 AND BELLA MEDOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF ECMC UNIT OF CSEA LOCAL 815, PETITIONERS- PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS, v. ERIE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION, ERIE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND JODY L. LOMEO, AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ERIE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS–DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.

CA 14–01234

Decided: March 27, 2015

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

COHEN, WEISS AND SIMON LLP, NEW YORK CITY (JOSHUA J. ELLISON OF COUNSEL), AND STEVEN A. CRAIN AND DAREN J. RYLEWICZ, CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ALBANY, FOR PETITIONERS–PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS. GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO (MATTHEW C. VAN VESSEM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS–DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On December 11, 2013, petitioners-plaintiffs (petitioners) commenced this hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action (proceeding) challenging a resolution adopted by respondent-defendant Erie County Medical Center Corporation Board of Directors (Board) on February 26, 2013. The resolution, among other things, authorized respondent-defendant Erie County Medical Center Corporation (ECMCC) “to directly administer applicable parts of the Civil Service Law,” effective immediately. In their petition-complaint (petition), petitioners alleged that the Board lacked authority to establish its own civil service system, that the Board acted in violation of Public Authorities Law and Civil Service Law and in an “ultra vires manner,” and that the resolution was “affected by an error of law or was arbitrary and capricious” (CPLR 7803[3] ). Supreme Court dismissed the petition as time-barred inasmuch as petitioners commenced the proceeding more than four months after the resolution was adopted. We affirm.

Petitioners contend that their petition was timely because no injury had yet occurred at the time the petition was filed. We reject that contention. The Board's adoption of the resolution constituted a definitive position that resulted in actual concrete injury because, pursuant to the resolution, ECMCC was immediately authorized to administer civil service functions, thereby usurping the authority of Erie County to do so (see generally Stop–The–Barge v. Cahill, 1 NY3d 218, 223).

We reject petitioners' further contention that the court should have issued a declaration that ECMCC and the Board violated Civil Service Law and Public Authorities Law. Petitioners cannot avoid dismissal of their untimely petition by casting their claim as one seeking declaratory relief (see generally New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. v McBarnette, 84 N.Y.2d 194, 201; Matter of Foley v. Masiello, 38 AD3d 1201, 1201–1202).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law