Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THOMAS J. TUDISCO, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. DAWNMARIE MINCER, DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint is reinstated in its entirety.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking to enforce an alleged oral agreement concerning the purchase of residential property. Several months after defendant filed an answer, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) and CPLR 3212 on the ground that the alleged agreement was not enforceable because of the statute of frauds (see General Obligations Law § 5–703[1] ). Supreme Court granted defendant's motion in part and dismissed the third and fourth causes of action. Plaintiff contends that defendant's motion should have been treated as a CPLR 3212 motion for summary judgment. We agree with that contention. The parties' course of litigation shows that they were “deliberately charting a summary judgment course” and treated the motion as a CPLR 3212 motion for summary judgment (Nowacki v. Becker, 71 AD3d 1496, 1497 [4th Dept 2010] ).
We agree with plaintiff that the court erred in granting defendant's motion in part. “The failure of [defendant] to support [her] motion with a copy of the pleadings requires denial of the motion, regardless of the merits of the motion” (D.J. Enters. of WNY v. Benderson, 294 A.D.2d 825, 825; see CPLR 3212[b]; Notaro v. Bison Constr. Corp., 32 AD3d 1218, 1219). In light of our determination, we
do not address plaintiff's remaining contentions.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CA 14–01305
Decided: March 27, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)