Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: RICKEY L. WILSON, PETITIONER–RESPONDENT, v. LINDA MCCRAY, RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT, AND JASMINE JAEL GONZALEZ, FORMERLY KNOWN AS FELICIA A. VADEN, FORMERLY KNOWN AS FELICIA MITCHELL, RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TANYA CONLEY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ROCHESTER.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Jasmine Jael Gonzalez (respondent), a nonparent, appeals from an order that, among other things, awarded sole custody of the subject child to petitioner father. “It is well established that, as between a parent and nonparent, the parent has a superior right to custody that cannot be denied unless the nonparent establishes that the parent has relinquished that right because of ‘surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness or other like extraordinary circumstances' “ (Matter of Gary G. v. Roslyn P., 248 A.D.2d 980, 981, quoting Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 544). The burden was on respondent to establish such extraordinary circumstances (see Matter of Darlene T., 28 N.Y.2d 391, 394, Matter of Wilson v. Smith, 24 AD3d 562, 563), and the record supports Family Court's determination that she failed to meet that burden.
We reject respondent's contention that the court erred in refusing to adjourn the hearing when she failed to appear. “The grant or denial of a motion for an adjournment for any purpose is a matter resting within the sound discretion of the trial court” (Matter of Steven B., 6 NY3d 888, 889 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). In view of respondent's repeated failures to appear, we perceive no abuse of discretion in the court's refusal to adjourn the hearing (see Matter of Lillian D.L., 29 AD3d 583, 584). Contrary to respondent's further contention, we conclude that the court properly took judicial notice of its own prior proceedings with respect to the father's paternity (see Matter of Gugino v. Tsvasman, 118 AD3d 1341, 1342).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CAF 13–00258
Decided: February 13, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)