IN RE: ADIRONDACK HEALTH–UIHLEIN (2015)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

IN RE: ADIRONDACK HEALTH–UIHLEIN LIVING CENTER, ET AL., PETITIONERS- PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS, v.
NIRA R. SHAH, M.D., COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH, STATE OF NEW YORK, ROBERT L. MEGNA, AS DIRECTOR OF BUDGET, AND ANDREW M. CUOMO, GOVERNOR, STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENTS–DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. v.

CA 14–00367

Decided: February 06, 2015

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (VICTOR PALADINO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS–DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP, ROCHESTER (F. PAUL GREENE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS–PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered February 3, 2014 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action. The order, insofar as appealed from, directed respondents to make future case mix adjustment payments in January and July of each calendar year.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the sixth decretal paragraph is vacated.

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law