Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MELISSA A. TRACY, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. DAVID CHRISTA CONSTRUCTION, INC., LECHASE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC, DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendants-appellants' motion is granted and the complaint against defendants-appellants is dismissed.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries that she allegedly sustained when she slipped and fell at the Greater Rochester International Airport. Defendant David Christa Construction, Inc. (Christa) was the construction manager for a construction project at the airport, and defendant LeChase Construction Services, LLC (LeChase) was the general contractor for the project. Defendants-appellants (defendants) moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them contending, inter alia, that they did not owe plaintiff a duty of care. We conclude that Supreme Court erred in denying the motion. As a preliminary matter, we note that, during the pendency of this appeal, plaintiff withdrew her contention that the deposition testimony excerpts submitted by defendants in support of their motion were not in admissible form, and we therefore do not address that contention. We conclude that defendants met their initial burden of establishing that they owed no duty of care to plaintiff who, at the time of her accident, was merely a third-party passerby with no relationship of privity with defendants (see generally Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). In opposition, plaintiff failed to establish that any of the exceptions set forth in Espinal v. Melville Snow Contrs. (98 N.Y.2d 136, 140) applies (see generally id.; Sniatecki v Violet Realty, 98 AD3d 1316, 1320–1321).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CA 14–01272
Decided: February 06, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)