Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EVA E. DUNLOP, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. SAINT LEO THE GREAT R.C. CHURCH AND CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BUFFALO, DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: On a prior appeal, this Court granted the motion of defendant Saint Leo the Great R.C. Church (Church) seeking to dismiss the action against it on the ground that plaintiff did not timely serve the complaint after the Church made a demand therefor (Dunlop v Saint Leo the Great R.C. Church, 109 AD3d 1120, lv denied 22 NY3d 858). Plaintiff subsequently moved for a default judgment against defendant Catholic Diocese of Buffalo (Diocese), and the Diocese cross-moved for an order dismissing the complaint against it for, among other things, lack of personal jurisdiction, asserting that plaintiff never properly effectuated service of process upon it. Supreme Court granted that part of the cross motion and awarded costs to the Diocese. We affirm.
As a preliminary matter, we note that, “[t]o avoid dismissal of this action, plaintiff[ ][was] required to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that jurisdiction was obtained over” the Diocese (Dunn v. Pallett, 66 AD3d 1179, 1180; see Joseph v. Siebtechnik, G.M.B.H., 172 A.D.2d 1056, 1056). In our view, plaintiff failed to meet that burden. Plaintiff contends that she obtained jurisdiction over the Diocese by serving its agent, i.e., the Church, but that contention is without merit. Plaintiff tendered no evidence establishing that the Church is a designated agent for service of process on the Diocese. In addition, plaintiff failed to establish that the Church was the
“ ‘involuntary’ agent” of the Diocese for the service of process inasmuch as she failed to establish “ ‘such complete control by the [Diocese] over the [Church] that it negates the conclusion that the [Church] is operated as a separate and independent entity’ “ (Feszczyszyn v. Gen. Motors Corp., 248 A.D.2d 939, 940–941). We conclude, instead, that the record establishes the Diocese and the Church are separate and distinct business entities (see Heenan v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 158 A.D.2d 587, 588). Plaintiff's attempt to use Religious Corporations Law §§ 91 and 92 to establish an involuntary agency relationship is unpersuasive inasmuch as those statutes do not confer on the Diocese the requisite complete control over the Church (see § 5).
Plaintiff further contends that she obtained jurisdiction over the Diocese by serving counsel for the Diocese, but the record does not contain any proof of such service. Indeed, counsel for the Diocese submitted an affirmation in which he stated that he “never agreed to accept service of process or any pleadings on behalf of the [Diocese] with respect to [this] matter.”
Contrary to plaintiff's further contention, the court properly awarded costs to the Diocese as the prevailing party on the cross motion (see CPLR 8106). In light of our determination, we do not reach plaintiff's remaining contention.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CA 14–00806
Decided: February 06, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)