Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent BARONE, Defendant–Appellant.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. V. Reddy Kancharla, Defendant–Appellant.
On remittitur from the Court of Appeals (23 NY3d 294 [2014] ), judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered May 26, 2010, convicting defendant Vincent Barone, after a jury trial, of enterprise corruption, attempted grand larceny in the third degree, two counts of scheme to defraud in the first degree and nine counts of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 5 1/3 to 16 years, as previously modified (101 AD3d 585 [1st Dept 2012] ) to the extent of directing that certain sentences be served concurrently, unanimously modified further, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on the enterprise corruption conviction to a term of 1 1/3 to 4 years, resulting in a new aggregate term of 1 1/3 to 4 years, and otherwise affirmed. Judgment, same court and Justice, rendered April 7, 2010, convicting defendant V. Reddy Kancharla, after a jury trial, of enterprise corruption, two counts of scheme to defraud in the first degree, nine counts of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree and three counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 7 to 21 years, as previously modified (id.) to the extent of vacating certain convictions of offering a false instrument for filing and directing that certain sentences be served concurrently, unanimously modified further, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on the enterprise corruption conviction to a term of 1 1/3 to 4 years, resulting in a new aggregate term of 1 1/3 to 4 years, and otherwise affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5) as to both defendants and proceedings in accordance with the stipulation of the parties regarding financial liability.
Defendants concede that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence.
Motions to withdraw appeal denied as academic.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 26, 2015
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)