Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Windy MINELLA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Richard J. RESTIFO, M.D., Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered September 16, 2013, which, in this medical malpractice action, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.
Personal jurisdiction does not exist pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1), as there is insufficient evidence that defendant “transacts any business within [New York State]” or that he “contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state” (CPLR 302[a][1] ). Indeed, it is uncontroverted that defendant is licensed to practice medicine in Connecticut, not New York. Although defendant is associated with a Connecticut facility (Split Rock) whose website displays a New York office and telephone number, Split Rock and defendant maintain separate websites. Further, the listing of a New York office and telephone number on a website, without more, is insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction (see Paterno v. Laser Spine Inst., ––– NY3d ––––, 2014 N.Y. Slip Op 08054, *5–6 [2014]; Arouh v. Budget Leasing, Inc., 63 AD3d 506 [1st Dept 2009] ). The Split Rock website “merely impart[s] information without permitting a business transaction” (Paterno, ––– NY3d at ––––, 2014 N.Y. Slip Op 08054, *6). Further, defendant averred without contradiction that the New York address and telephone number on the website refers to his associate Dr. Neil Gordon, who is licensed to (and does) practice medicine in New York. That defendant's associate is a licensed New York physician does not confer jurisdiction over defendant (see Barrett v. Toroyan, 28 AD3d 331, 333 [1st Dept 2006] ).
Personal jurisdiction does not exist pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(3)(i), as plaintiff was injured outside New York State. In a medical malpractice action, for the purposes of the long-arm statute, “the injury occurs where the malpractice took place” (O'Brien v. Hackensack Univ. Med. Ctr., 305 A.D.2d 199, 202 [1st Dept 2003] ), and it is undisputed that the alleged malpractice here occurred in Connecticut.
Discovery on the jurisdictional issue is not warranted, as plaintiff has failed to make a “sufficient start” in demonstrating the existence of long-arm jurisdiction over defendant (cf. Peterson v. Spartan Indus., 33 N.Y.2d 463, 467 [1974]; see SunLight Gen. Capital LLC v. CJS Invs. Inc., 114 AD3d 521, 522 [1st Dept 2014] ).
Based on the foregoing determination, it is unnecessary to determine whether New York is a convenient forum.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 20, 2015
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)