Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOHN M. BLACK, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, two counts of predatory sexual assault against a child (Penal Law § 130.96). Defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence because neither the victim's testimony nor defendant's admissions to the police were credible. We reject that contention. Even assuming, arguendo, that a different verdict would not have been unreasonable, we note that “the jury was in the best position to assess the credibility of the witnesses and, on this record, it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” (People v. Orta, 12 AD3d 1147, 1147, lv denied 4 NY3d 801; see People v. McCray, 121 AD3d 1549, 1552). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).
Defendant further contends that Supreme Court erred in admitting in evidence the victim's sexual assault examination report because defendant was unable to confront the nurse examiner who prepared the report. That contention is unpreserved for our review, however, inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the report at trial (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Snyder, 100 AD3d 1367, 1369, lv denied 21 NY3d 1010), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[6][a] ). Contrary to the further contention of defendant, we conclude that defense counsel was not ineffective in failing to object to the report because, under the circumstances of this case, the decision not to object was consistent with a legitimate trial strategy (see generally People v. Benevento, 91 NY3d 708, 712–713).
We agree with defendant that certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation were improper, including an impermissible “safe streets” argument (see People v. Scott, 60 AD3d 1483, 1484, lv. denied 12 NY3d 859; People v. Nevedo, 202 A.D.2d 183, 185; People v. Hanright, 187 A.D.2d 1021, 1021, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 840). We conclude, however, that the prosecutor's comments “were not so pervasive or egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial” (People v. Jones, 114 AD3d 1239, 1241, lv denied 23 NY3d 1038 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Hanright, 187 A.D.2d at 1021). Thus, contrary to the further contention of defendant, the “failure to object to those comments does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel” (People v. Nicholson, 118 AD3d 1423, 1425).
Finally, defendant contends that the People's expert was improperly allowed to testify that the victim made a credible complaint of sexual abuse. We reject that contention, inasmuch as the testimony of the expert, who had never met defendant or the victim, was “general in nature and d[id] not attempt to impermissibly prove that the charged crimes occurred” (People v. Gayden, 107 AD3d 1428, 1428, lv denied 22 NY3d 1138 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Williams, 20 NY3d 579, 584; People v. Olson, 110 AD3d 1373, 1376, lv denied 23 NY3d 1023).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 12–01369
Decided: January 02, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)