Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mary McCRAE, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant–Appellant, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered on or about January 16, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Transit Authority's (defendant) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for negligence after a fifty-pound sandbag struck and killed Sha–Keia McCrae, who was standing on the public sidewalk below the Rockaway Avenue train station of the Number 3 subway line. Plaintiff alleged that the Transit Authority, acting in a proprietary capacity as owner and operator of the station, failed properly to secure the sandbag box, and thereby failed to maintain the subject premises in a reasonably safe condition. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that the alleged negligent act of failing to secure the sandbag involved a governmental function that provided it immunity given the absence of a special relationship with the decedent.
Even if the failure to secure the sandbag can be characterized as a “security deficiency,” as this deficiency does not serve as part of defendant's general security plan to protect the public pursuant to its police powers, does not implicate the allocation of police resources, and does not require the expenditure of substantial sums on capital improvements, we find that the alleged negligent act was so overwhelmingly proprietary in nature as to place the source of defendant's asserted liability well toward the proprietary function terminus of the continuum described in Miller v. State of New York (62 N.Y.2d 506, 511–512 [1984] )(see Matter of World Trade Ctr. Bombing Litig., 17 NY3d 428, 455 [2011], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S Ct 133 [2012]; Granata v. City of White Plains, 120 AD3d 1187 [2d Dept 2014] ).
Further, the Supreme Court correctly determined that triable issues of fact exist as to the foreseeability of the apparent assault upon the decedent, thus precluding the award of summary judgment to defendant.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 16, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)