Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOHNNY BOYDE, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65[2] ), sexual abuse in the second degree (§ 130.60[2] ), and endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10[1] ). Defendant contends that his plea should be vacated on the ground that it was coerced by County Court's statement that it would impose the maximum permissible sentence of imprisonment in the event defendant was convicted following a trial. As the People correctly concede, defendant's contention “ ‘survives [a] valid waiver of the right to appeal’ “ (People v. Zimmerman, 100 AD3d 1360, 1362, lv denied 20 NY3d 1015; see People v. Sparcino, 78 AD3d 1508, 1509, lv denied 16 NY3d 746). Although “[d]efendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea was coerced” (People v. Lando, 61 AD3d 1389, 1389, lv denied 13 NY3d 746; see People v. Boyd, 101 AD3d 1683, 1683), we exercise our power to review his contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[3][c] ). We agree with defendant that “the court's statement[ ] do[es] not amount to a description of the range of the potential sentences but, rather,[it] constitutes impermissible coercion, ‘rendering the plea involuntary and requiring its vacatur’ “ (People v. Flinn, 60 AD3d 1304, 1305; see People v. Kelley, 114 AD3d 1229, 1230).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 13–00991
Decided: November 14, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)