Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ANTONIO R. DAVIS, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3] ), defendant contends that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered because, inter alia, County Court failed to advise him that he was subject to a period of postrelease supervision as a condition of the plea. Initially, although we reject defendant's contention that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (cf. People v. Brown, 296 A.D.2d 860, 860, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 767), his challenge to the voluntariness of the plea survives his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Cullen, 62 AD3d 1155, 1156, lv denied 13 NY3d 795).
As the People correctly concede, defendant's contention requires reversal. Where, as here, “ ‘a trial judge does not fulfill the obligation to advise a defendant of postrelease supervision during the plea allocution, the defendant may challenge the plea as not knowing, voluntary and intelligent on direct appeal, notwithstanding the absence of a postallocution motion’ “ raising that contention (People v. Boyd, 12 NY3d 390, 393, quoting People v. Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545–546). We therefore reverse the judgment, vacate the plea and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
In light of our determination, we do not address defendant's remaining contentions.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 12–02043
Decided: September 26, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)