Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. TIMOTHY O. FARRARE, ALSO KNOWN AS JOHN DOE, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20[1] ) and two counts of murder in the second degree (§ 125.25[3] [felony murder] ), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying his application pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky (476 U.S. 79). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his procedural challenge to the court's disposition of his Batson application (see People v. Rodriguez, 93 AD3d 595, 595, lv denied 19 NY3d 966; People v. Parker, 304 A.D.2d 146, 156, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 585) and, in any event, that challenge lacks merit. The court at least implicitly concluded that the prosecutor's explanation was not pretextual (see People v. Dandridge, 26 AD3d 779, 779–780; People v. Pena, 251 A.D.2d 26, 34, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 929; cf. People v. Morgan, 75 AD3d 1050, 1051–1052, lv denied 15 NY3d 894). We conclude with respect to defendant's challenge to the merits of the court's Batson ruling that the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the prosecutor's explanation for her peremptory challenge with respect to the subject juror was not pretextual (see People v. Thompson, 59 AD3d 1115, 1117, lv denied 12 NY3d 860; see also People v. Hodges, 99 AD3d 629, 629, lv denied 20 NY3d 1062; People v. Johnson, 74 AD3d 1912, 1913). Contrary to defendant's further contention, there was probable cause for the order of an Ohio court authorizing the People herein to obtain a sample of defendant's blood while defendant was incarcerated in Ohio (see People v. Afrika, 13 AD3d 1218, 1219–1220, lv denied 4 NY3d 827; see also People v. Smith, 95 AD3d 21, 24; see generally People v. LeRow, 70 AD3d 66, 70).
We reject defendant's contention in both his main and pro se supplemental briefs that the court abused its discretion in denying his request for additional DNA testing. The record establishes that defendant's request was made on the eve of trial and was merely a “dilatory tactic” (People v. Arroyave, 49 N.Y.2d 264, 272; see People v. Brandi E., 38 AD3d 1218, 1218, lv denied 9 NY3d 863). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant preserved for our review his contention that the court's determination denied him due process of law and the ability to present a defense, we conclude that his contention lacks merit (see generally Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 689–690).
We likewise reject defendant's further contention in his pro se supplemental brief that the verdict is inconsistent or repugnant inasmuch as he was acquitted of intentional murder (Penal Law § 125.25[1] ) but convicted of two counts of felony murder (§ 125.25[3]; cf. People v. Sampson, 145 A.D.2d 910, 910, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 982; see generally People v. Trappier, 87 N.Y.2d 55, 58). Finally, we reject the contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain testimony of the police officer who responded to the scene of the crime (see generally People v. Cantave, 21 NY3d 374, 381, clarification denied 21 NY3d 1070; People v. Miller, 115 AD3d 1302, 1303–1304).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 09–02535
Decided: June 20, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)