Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. KENNETH S. VIRGES, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03[3] ) and criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree (§ 221.10 [2] ). County Court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the evidence seized from his person and vehicle. The police officer had an “objective, credible reason” for approaching defendant's parked vehicle and requesting information based on a tip provided by an anonymous informant, who reported that a man was sitting in a gray car smoking marihuana at a certain address (People v. Ocasio, 85 N.Y.2d 982, 985; see People v. Boler, 106 AD3d 1119, 1121). Defendant's vehicle matched that description and was parked at that address. When the police officer smelled marihuana, he had probable cause to search defendant and the vehicle for contraband (see People v. Robinson, 103 AD3d 421, 421–422, lv denied 20 NY3d 1103; People v. Contant, 90 AD3d 779, 780, lv denied 18 NY3d 956; People v. Black, 59 AD3d 1050, 1051, lv denied 12 NY3d 851; see generally Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 351; People v. Blasich, 73 N.Y.2d 673, 678).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: KA 13–01432
Decided: June 20, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)