Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gabriel Hernandez, Defendant–Appellant.
_
Order, Supreme Court, New York (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level two sexually violent offender adjudication. Defendant does not contest 65 of the 75 points required for a level two adjudication. The court properly assessed 10 points for forcible compulsion, based on evidence that defendant overpowered and grabbed the 11–year–old victim and took her to a stairway for the purpose of raping her, and tried to place his hand over her mouth to prevent her from screaming. The court also properly assessed 15 points for failure to accept responsibility, based on statements by defendant that tended to minimize his guilt, and his unjustified refusal to participate in sex offender treatment even after a program in his native language was offered.
The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see People v. Cintron, 12 NY3d 60, 70, cert denied sub nom. Knox v. New York, 558 U.S. 1011 [2009]; People v. Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008] ). Defendant did not demonstrate any mitigating factors, not already taken into account in the risk assessment instrument, that would warrant a downward departure, given the seriousness of the underlying conduct committed against a child.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 1247 6
Decided: May 13, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)