Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenyaitta Foreman, Defendant–Appellant.
_
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered November 20, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three to six years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion when it relieved assigned counsel. Under the totality of the circumstances, the court's action did not interfere with an established attorney-client relationship, and the replacement of counsel was in any event “justified by overriding concerns of fairness or efficiency” (People v. Knowles, 88 N.Y.2d 763, 769 [1996] ).
The attorney whose removal is at issue only represented defendant at the early stages of the case. After defendant was found unfit to proceed pursuant to CPL article 730, the attorney, who was admittedly preoccupied with other matters, repeatedly and unnecessarily delayed performance of the simple task of confirming the report. This delay resulted in defendant being detained in a correctional facility rather than in a psychiatric institution, and assignment of new counsel was in defendant's best interests.
Moreover, shortly after defendant was returned from Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center as competent, the replacement counsel negotiated a disposition. In the course of taking defendant's guilty plea, the court offered to reinstate the original assigned counsel. However, defendant expressed satisfaction with his new attorney and declined the offer of reinstatement.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 1240 3
Decided: May 06, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)