SADE WATSON PLAINTIFF APPELLANT v. KIBLER ENTERPRISES ARTHUR BECKER JR MICHAEL BECKER MARK BECKER JOSEPH SMIDT PETER SOBEL DEFENDANTS RESPONDENTS ET AL DEFENDANT (2014)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

SADE WATSON, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. KIBLER ENTERPRISES, ARTHUR BECKER, JR., MICHAEL BECKER, MARK BECKER, JOSEPH SMIDT, PETER SOBEL, DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

CA 13–01795

Decided: May 02, 2014

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, UTICA (MO ATHARI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT. DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (AMY ARCHER FLAHERTY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS KIBLER ENTERPRISES, ARTHUR BECKER, JR., MICHAEL BECKER AND MARK BECKER.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Pagan v. Rafter, 107 AD3d 1505, 1507).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network