Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Phyllis SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. KINGS THIRD AVE. PHARMACY, INC., etc., Defendant–Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered January 8, 2013, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when she allegedly tripped and fell over a display rack in the aisle of defendant's store. Defendant demonstrated that the display rack was an open and obvious condition and was not inherently dangerous (see e.g. Schulman v. Old Navy/Gap, Inc., 45 AD3d 475 [1st Dept 2007] ). Defendant referred to plaintiff's testimony that she saw the display rack before the accident and submitted photographs of the rack showing its open and obvious nature, and that it was placed in a reasonably safe location. The photographs also show that the base did not protrude into the aisle, was essentially flush with the shelves above, and that the rack was placed flat against the shelving in the aisle, which was clear and uncluttered (see Gonzalez v. Dong Yun Corp., 110 AD3d 484 [1st Dept 2013]; Speirs v. Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods, 268 A.D.2d 581 [2d Dept 2000] ).
In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to her argument that the display rack was placed at the end of the aisle such that she did not have sufficient time to perceive it upon turning into the aisle, the evidence, including her testimony, shows that the rack was located at least several feet into the aisle (compare Westbrook v. WR Activities–Cabrera Mkts., 5 AD3d 69 [1st Dept 2004]; Robinson v. 206–16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp., 82 AD3d 735 [2d Dept 2011] ). Moreover, plaintiff stated that she noticed the rack before the accident, and her expert's affidavit fails to raise a triable issue, and was conclusory and speculative (see e.g. Vazquez v. JRG Realty Corp., 81 AD3d 555 [1st Dept 2011] ).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 08, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)