Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ELLIOTT I. JAMES, ALSO KNOWN AS PIG, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously vacated on the law and the matter is remitted to Cattaraugus County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence imposed upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16[1] ). On appeal, defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request to redact the presentence report to correct alleged inaccuracies therein, and in failing to conduct a conference or summary hearing to address the alleged inaccuracies. Specifically, defendant contends that the presentence report contained errors with respect to his criminal history. In addition, he contends that the presentence report erroneously included statements that he has a history of assault toward women and that he is at the highest possible risk for violent recidivism, when in fact his criminal history does not contain any convictions based on violent crimes. “ ‘If the investigation report contains incorrect information, [defendant] should object at sentencing to the inclusion of the erroneous information and move to strike it ․ The court may conduct a conference or a summary hearing to resolve discrepancies in sentencing information’ “ (People v. Boice, 6 Misc.3d 1014[A], 2004 N.Y. Slip Op 51788[U], *4–5). When defendant herein objected to the contents of the presentence report and sought redaction, the court stated that it did not know the procedure by which to correct the information. We thus conclude that defendant was not properly afforded an opportunity to challenge the contents of the presentence report (cf. People v. Thomas, 2 AD3d 982, 984, lv denied 1 NY3d 602). We therefore vacate the resentence and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings in accordance with our decision.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 12–00823
Decided: February 14, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)