Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Fawaz A., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Franklyn B.C., Respondent–Appellant, Nafysa J., Respondent, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adira Hulkower of counsel), attorney for the child.
_
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Kelly A. O'Neill Levy, J.), entered on or about March 30, 2012, which, upon a fact-finding determination of neglect by the infliction of excessive corporal punishment, transferred custody of the subject child to petitioner Administration for Children's Services until the next permanency hearing, and directed appellant to refrain from inflicting corporal punishment on the child and to continue to attend family therapy and individual counseling until no longer recommended, unanimously affirmed insofar as it brings up for review the fact-finding determination of neglect, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed as moot, without costs.
The court properly found that appellant maternal uncle neglected the subject child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on him and permitting the babysitter to do the same, based upon the testimony of the child's teacher and a caseworker that they observed bruises on the child's body, which the child attributed to corporal punishment by appellant and the babysitter (see Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004] ).
The appeal from the placement terms of the dispositional order is moot, since the placement terms of the order have expired by their own terms, and were superseded by subsequent orders (see Matter of Fred Darryl B., 41 AD3d 276, 277 [1st Dept 2007] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 1141 2
Decided: December 31, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)