Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. EVERETT M. DURANT, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10[1] ). Viewing the evidence in light of the contested element of larcenous intent as charged to the jury (see generally People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). “Where, as here, witness credibility is of paramount importance to the determination of guilt or innocence, the appellate court must give [g]reat deference ․ [to the] fact-finder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and observe demeanor” (People v. McMillon, 77 AD3d 1375, 1376, lv denied 16 NY3d 897 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). While a finding that defendant did not have the requisite intent would not have been unreasonable, “it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” (id.). The victim testified that defendant stole his wallet during a group assault on him, and the People presented evidence establishing that defendant “knowingly participated and continued to participate even after his companion [s'] intentions [to take the victim's cell phone] became clear” and thus “shared a ‘community of purpose’ with his companion[s]” (People v. Allah, 71 N.Y.2d 830, 832). Contrary to defendant's further contention, County Court properly denied his request for an adverse inference charge concerning the failure of the police to record his interrogation electronically (see McMillon, 77 AD3d at 1375; People v. Hammons, 68 AD3d 1800, 1801, lv denied 14 NY3d 801).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 09–01799
Decided: December 27, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)