Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MEILANI M. ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; MAYA M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed except insofar as respondent challenges the denial of her attorney's request for an adjournment and the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, respondent mother appeals in appeal Nos. 1 and 2 from orders of fact-finding and disposition that, inter alia, terminated her parental rights with respect to the subject children on the ground of permanent neglect. The orders were entered following a fact-finding hearing at which the mother failed to appear and in which her attorney, although present, elected not to participate (see Matter of Ramere D. [Biesha D.], 177 AD3d 1386, 1386 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 904 [2020]; Matter of Makia S. [Catherine S.], 134 AD3d 1445, 1445-1446 [4th Dept 2015]). Where, as here, the orders appealed from were made upon the mother's default, “review is limited to matters which were the subject of contest below” (Ramere D., 177 AD3d at 1386 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Thus, in both appeals, review is limited to Family Court's denial of the request of the mother's attorney for an adjournment (see id. at 1386-1387).
“Whether to grant or deny an adjournment rests within the trial court's sound discretion, and such requests should be granted only upon a showing of good cause” (Matter of John D., Jr. [John D.], 199 AD3d 1412, 1413 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 903 [2022] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Jayden M. [Carlos M.], 237 AD3d 1560, 1563 [4th Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 902 [2025]). We reject the mother's contention that the court abused its discretion in denying the request for an adjournment inasmuch as counsel offered no good cause for the adjournment. Moreover, the mother had a history of failing to appear, and a significant amount of time had passed since the children were placed outside of the mother's care (see Matter of Tyrone O. [Lillian G.], 199 AD3d 1386, 1387 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 904 [2022]; Matter of Ca’leb R.D. [Mary D.S.], 121 AD3d 890, 891 [2d Dept 2014]).
Entered: June 26, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 453
Decided: June 26, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)