Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
N Gloria Blaze, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. New York City Department of Education, Defendant–Respondent.
_
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered March 11, 2013, which denied plaintiff's motion to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly denied plaintiff's motion to file a late notice of claim, where plaintiff offered no excuse for her failure to file a timely notice of claim; failed to demonstrate that defendant acquired actual knowledge of the facts underlying the claim within 90 days or a reasonable time thereafter; and failed in her burden to demonstrate that defendant would not be substantially prejudiced by the delay (see Perez v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 81 AD3d 448 [1 st Dept 2011]; Matter of Strauss v. New York City Tr. Auth., 195 A.D.2d 322 [1 st Dept 1993] ). “[K]nowledge of the facts underlying an occurrence does not constitute knowledge of the claim. What satisfies the statute is not knowledge of the wrong. What the statute exacts is notice of the claim” (Liberty Group Holdings v. City of New York, 5 AD3d 148, 149 [1 st Dept 2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 609 [2004] [internal quotation marks omitted], quoting Chattergoon v. New York City Hous. Auth., 161 A.D.2d 141, 142 [1990], affd 78 N.Y.2d 958 [1991] ).
In any event, plaintiff's claim accrued, at the latest, in April 2011, when she asserts that she was “constructively forced into early retirement,” making her motion to file a late notice of claim well beyond the limitation period of, at most, 1 year and 90 days (Education Law 3813[3], [2–b]; General Municipal Law § 50–i). Thus, the court was without authority to grant plaintiff the requested relief (see Education Law § 3813[2], [2–a]; General Municipal Law § 50–i; Consolidated Constr. Group, LLC v Bethpage Union Free School Dist., 39 AD3d 792, 794–795 [2d Dept 2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 980 [2007] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 1124 0
Decided: December 03, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)