DENNIS GREEN AND THERESA GREEN PLAINTIFFS RESPONDENTS v. ASSOCIATED MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF NY PLLC AMP UROLOGY TIMOTHY KENDRICK RPAC AND WILLIAM ROBERTS DEFENDANTS APPELLANTS ACTION NO (2013)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

DENNIS GREEN AND THERESA GREEN, PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS, v. ASSOCIATED MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF NY, PLLC, AMP UROLOGY, TIMOTHY E. KENDRICK, RPAC, AND WILLIAM H. ROBERTS, M.D., DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. (ACTION NO. 1.)
DENNIS GREEN AND THERESA GREEN, PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS, v. SYRACUSE UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. (ACTION NO. 2.)
DENNIS GREEN AND THERESA GREEN, PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH KENDRICK, M.D., DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. (ACTION NO. 3.) (APPEAL NO. 2.)

CA 12–02186

Decided: November 15, 2013

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

MARTIN, GANOTIS, BROWN, MOULD & CURRIE, P.C., DEWITT (DANIEL P. LARABY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. DEFRANCISCO & FALGIATANO LAW FIRM, SYRACUSE (JEAN MARIE WESTLAKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted and the complaints are dismissed without prejudice.

Same Memorandum as in Green v Associated Med. Professionals of NY, PLLC ( [appeal No. 1] _ AD3d _ [Nov. 15, 2013).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network