Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. OSCAR A. ARANDA, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a nonjury verdict, of predatory sexual assault against a child (Penal Law § 130.96) and three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree (§ 130.65[3] ). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his statement to the victim's stepfather was inadmissible hearsay and did not fall within the admission exception to the hearsay rule (see CPL 470.05[2]; see generally People v. Jones, 92 AD3d 1218, 1218, lv denied 19 NY3d 962), and we decline to exercise our power to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[6][a] ). We reject defendant's further contention that defense counsel's failure to object to that testimony constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant's statement was indeed an admission (see People v. Ward, 107 AD3d 1605, 1605; see also Jerome Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 8–204 [Farrell 11th ed 1995] ), and thus there was little or no chance that the objection would have been sustained (see generally People v. Lewis, 67 AD3d 1396, 1396, lv denied 14 NY3d 772). Finally, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes in this nonjury trial (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 11–00919
Decided: November 08, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)