Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIE SYKES, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03[3] ), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02[1] ), unlawful possession of marihuana (§ 221.05), failure to display head lamps (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 375[2][a] [1] ), and improper license plates (§ 402[1] ). We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in refusing to suppress the gun recovered from the vehicle based upon the inevitable discovery doctrine. The testimony at the suppression hearing established that, during a lawful traffic stop, one of the police officers asked defendant whether there were any drugs or weapons in the vehicle before instructing defendant to exit the vehicle. After defendant admitted to having marihuana on his person, the police officer asked defendant to exit the vehicle and, following suspicious behavior by another occupant of the vehicle, searched the vehicle and found a gun in plain view. Notably, the court did not address whether the officer had the requisite founded suspicion of criminal activity to justify an inquiry concerning the presence of drugs or weapons in the vehicle (see generally People v. Garcia, 20 NY3d 317, 322–323; People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223). Instead, the court refused to suppress the gun on the ground that the police “could” have taken various actions after the traffic stop that would have inevitably led to the discovery of the gun. The People, however, did not raise the inevitable discovery doctrine as a ground for denying suppression of the gun, nor did they meet their burden of “demonstrat[ing] a very high degree of probability that normal police procedures would have uncovered the challenged evidence independently of [a] tainted source” (People v. Turriago, 90 N.Y.2d 77, 86, rearg. denied 90 N.Y.2d 77 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Fitzpatrick, 32 N.Y.2d 499, 507, cert denied 414 U.S. 1033, 1050; People v. Walker, 198 A.D.2d 785, 787; cf. People v. Watson, 188 A.D.2d 501, 502).
Further, even if a founded suspicion of criminal activity supported the police officer's inquiry (see Garcia, 20 NY3d at 322–323), we are precluded from affirming with respect to the court's refusal to suppress the gun “on a theory not reached by the suppression court” (People v. Ingram, 18 NY3d 948, 949; see People v. Concepcion, 17 NY3d 192, 195; People v. LaFontaine, 92 N.Y.2d 470, 473–474, rearg. denied 94 N.Y.2d 849). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine whether the police officer had a founded suspicion of criminal activity to justify his inquiry (see generally People v. Coles, 105 AD3d 1360, 1363).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 11–02049
Decided: October 04, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)