Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Charles MEIER, Petitioner–Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION LEWISTON PORTER CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent–Appellant.
Respondent appeals from a judgment granting the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court determined that the resignation of petitioner, a tenured teacher formerly employed by respondent, “was involuntarily submitted as a result of fraud, coercion and duress” and directed his reinstatement with back pay and benefits. We agree with respondent that the court erred in granting relief to petitioner based solely on the papers before it. “A resignation under coercion or duress is not a voluntary act and may be nullified” (Matter of Mangee [Mamorella], 239 A.D.2d 892, 892; see Matter of Gould v. Board of Educ. of Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 81 N.Y.2d 446, 451). However, “it has consistently been held that a threat to do that which one has the legal right to do does not constitute duress” (Matter of Rychlick v. Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 863, 864, affd for reasons stated 63 N.Y.2d 643; see Matter of Hopkins v. Governale, 222 A.D.2d 435, 436). Thus, “ ‘[a] person's resignation may not be considered to be obtained under duress unless the employer threatened to take action which it had no right to take’ “ (Hopkins, 222 A.D.2d at 436). Moreover, although “in appropriate circumstances ․ a tenured teacher may, as part of a stipulation in settlement of a disciplinary proceeding brought against him [or her], waive his or her continued right to the protections afforded by section 3020–a of the Education Law” (Matter of Abramovich v. Board of Educ. of Cent. Sch. Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Brookhaven & Smithtown, 46 N.Y.2d 450, 452, rearg. denied 46 N.Y.2d 1076, cert denied 444 U.S. 845), it is also the case that such settlements must be voluntarily and knowingly made and may not be “ ‘lightly, inadvertently, inadvisedly or improvidently’ entered into” (id. at 456). We conclude on this record that the court should have conducted a trial pursuant to CPLR 7804(h) “to resolve the factual issue raised by the pleadings and affidavits concerning petitioner's allegations of duress, and to make appropriate findings of fact before proceeding any further” (Matter of Cacchioli v. Hoberman, 31 N.Y.2d 287, 291). We therefore reverse the judgment and remit the matter to Supreme Court for that purpose.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Niagara County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 03, 2013
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)