Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, etc ., Petitioner–Respondent, v. CHUKCHANSI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, Respondent, Cascade Entertainment Group, LLC, Respondent–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered October 19, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the petition to compel respondent Cascade Entertainment Group, LLC to arbitrate, and denied Cascade's motion to permanently stay arbitration as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition denied, Cascade's motion granted, and the proceeding dismissed as against Cascade.
Cascade signed the “Payment Agreement for Insurance and Risk Management Services” between petitioner and respondent Chukchansi Economic Development Authority (CEDA) solely as the agent of CEDA, a disclosed principal; it did not sign the agreement a second time on its own behalf. There being no other “clear and explicit” evidence that Cascade intended to be bound by the Payment Agreement, it is not bound by the arbitration provisions contained therein (see Savoy Record Co. v. Cardinal Export Corp., 15 N.Y.2d 1 [1964]; Salzman Sign Co. v. Beck, 10 N.Y.2d 63 [1961]; Performance Comercial Importadora E Exportadora Ltda. v. Sewa Intl. Fashions Pvt. Ltd., 79 A.D.3d 673, 915 N.Y.S.2d 44 [1st Dept 2010] ).
Contrary to petitioner's argument, Cascade is not bound by the Payment Agreement based on the agreement's definition of “You,” which includes “associated organizations that are included as Named Insureds.” Cascade is not “associated” with CEDA, as petitioner contends, by virtue of their agency-principal relationship. Mere contractual agreements do not constitute associations or affiliations (see e.g. Fairfield Dev., Inc. v. J.D.I. Contr. & Supply, Inc., 703 F Supp 2d 1211, 1216 [D Colo 2010]; Preston Trucking Co., Inc. v. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co., 712 F.Supp. 1208, 1212 [WD Pa 1989]; In re Marine Sulphur Transp. Corp., 312 F.Supp. 1081, 1103 [SD N.Y.1970], affd in part, revd in part on other grounds 460 F.2d 89 [2d Cir1972], cert denied 409 U.S. 982 [1972] ). Indeed, the definition of “You” does not embrace mere contractual agreements. The term “associated organizations” is grouped with the terms “predecessor and successor organizations” and “subsidiary [or] affiliated ․ organizations,” which describe formal corporate relationships, and, equally, must be understood to refer to a formal corporate relationship (see e.g. National Football League v. Vigilant Ins. Co., 36 A.D.3d 207, 213–214, 824 N.Y.S.2d 72 [1st Dept 2006] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 12, 2013
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)