Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Valerie GUNTUR, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, Defendant–Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered October 7, 2011, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant airline established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she slipped and fell on “wet icy dirt” while boarding defendant's aircraft, after her flight had been delayed due to inclement weather. Defendant submitted, inter alia, climatological records showing that plaintiff's accident occurred during an ongoing storm, during which its duty to remedy a dangerous condition caused by the storm was suspended (see Pippo v. City of New York, 43 A.D.3d 303, 304, 842 N.Y.S.2d 367 [1st Dept 2007]; Blackwood v. New York City Tr. Auth.., 36 A.D.3d 522, 828 N.Y.S.2d 354 [1st Dept 2007] ). Defendant had no obligation to provide a constant remedy for tracked-in or leaking water during the storm, and showed that it took reasonable precautions to address wet conditions by laying a carpet runner along the jetbridge and placing a canopy over the aircraft door (see Pomahac v. TrizecHahn 1065 Ave. of Ams., LLC, 65 A.D.3d 462, 464–466, 884 N.Y.S.2d 402 [1st Dept 2009]; Solazzo v. New York City Tr. Auth., 21 A.D.3d 735 [2005], affd 6 N.Y.3d 734 [2005] ).
Plaintiff's opposition failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the testimony of defendant's employee, stating that the precipitation was “[o]n and off,” that day does not raise a triable issue since it does not show that plaintiff's accident occurred during “a significant lull in the storm,” or a reasonable time after the storm had ceased (Pipero v. New York City Tr. Auth., 69 A.D.3d 493, 493, 894 N.Y.S.2d 39 [1st Dept 2010]; see Ioele v. Wal–Mart Stores, 290 A.D.2d 614, 616, 736 N.Y.S.2d 130 [3d Dept 2002] ). Indeed, the employee also testified that the rain or snow ended “well into midnight the next morning.”
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 14, 2013
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)