Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Ali A. ZAHRAN, also Known as Ali Zahran, Defendant.
Ali A. Zahran, Also Known As Ali Zahran, Third Party Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Michael Viscome, et al., Third–Party Defendants, and Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola, LLC, Third–Party Defendant–Appellant.
Third-party defendant Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola, LLC (Rupp Baase) appeals from an order denying those parts of its motion to dismiss the second and fifth causes of action in the third-party complaint against it. Rupp Baase moved for dismissal of the third-party complaint against it based on documentary evidence, i.e., the retainer agreement between defendant-third-party plaintiff (defendant) and Rupp Baase, and the failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7] ). We agree with Rupp Baase that the retainer agreement constitutes documentary evidence and “ ‘resolves all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively disposes of the [defendant's] claim [s]’ “ against it, including the claim in the fifth cause of action for malpractice (Fortis Fin. Servs. v. Fimat Futures USA, 290 A.D.2d 383, 383; see Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 88). Additionally, we agree with Rupp Baase that the fraud claim against it arises from the same set of facts as the claim in the fifth cause of action for malpractice and does not allege distinct damages, and thus the fraud claim against it must be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action as well (see Sitar v. Sitar, 50 AD3d 667, 670; Iannucci v. Kucker & Bruh, LLP, 42 AD3d 436, 436–437). Finally, the claim for punitive damages should be dismissed, because defendant “failed to allege conduct that was directed to the general public or that evinced the requisite high degree of moral turpitude or wanton dishonesty” (Englert v. Schaffer, 61 AD3d 1362, 1363 [internal quotation marks omitted] ).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted in its entirety and the third-party complaint against third-party defendant Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola, LLC is dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 16, 2012
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)